Promote correcting Our political structure, not merely the symptoms of Corruption
~James Dunn

Please forward the following commentary as you feel is appropriate.

Focus on the problem, not the symptoms of corruption.

.

Regarding Political Corruption:

The problem isn’t a person, or even a group of politicians. The problem is the corrupt practices that are rewarded by special interest groups. Pandering should be illegal for politicians to participate in. Yet lobby groups and backdoor negotiations are sanctioned within our Political Structure.

Condolessa Rice has an Oil Tanker named after her. That is only a symptom. The problem is that our political system structurally encourages politicians to indirectly accept bribes and not be accountable for their actions.

We need to Ethically Eliminate ALL Political Corruption!

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/jamesbdunn?p=57

.

Our Political Structure can easily be changed to provide ethical oversight of our politicians.

The National Security Agency (NSA) is solely controlled by the Presidential Office. The NSA needs to be controlled by US State elected doctors of science that have no significant involvement with special interests; which would include periodic lie detection testing. Their job would be to ethically and systematically monitor everything for corruption, criminal activity, and dangerous research/processes that could endanger national security, at every level including city government, and promote the physicial well-being of its citizens.

The NSA would have NO DIRECT means of acting upon the information collected and analyzed; thereby requiring cooperation between law enforcement, the Senate, Congress, and the Executive branches; a self-regulating control measure.

Offending politicians and the people who attempt to corrupt them with corrupt activities would at first be quietly notified and allowed to correct their deficiencies.

Failing to adequately respond to the warnings of the NSA, the NSA reports the activities to the Next higher political office with recommendations for corrective actions and notification to public media as to the need for full investigation. In addition to the proof provided by the NSA, other corruption may surface during the investigation.

A current corrupt practice without the NSA:

A City Councilman negotiates a bribe with a local developer. These are Backdoor negotiations hidden from public view, but money does not directly change hands. The Counsilman champions rezoning a commercial area to residential, which lowers property values by half. The developer purchases the desired lands and then rezones it for commercial use; saving many millions of dollars for the developer. The developer purchases burial plots in the name of the City Councilman. At a later date, the burial plots are sold by the counsilman who is now Governor of that State. No one has any proof that anything corrupt took place.

The proposed scenario with the backing of the NSA:

Scenario 1) A City Councilman negotiates a bribe with a local developer. The NSA reprimands both, with the Councilman and Developer heeding the warning and they return to business as usual. So long as this does not repeat, the careers of both are unhindered.

Scenario 2) A City Councilman negotiates a bribe with a local developer. The NSA reprimands both, but the Councilman ignores the NSA warning. The Counsilman begins to champion rezoning a commercial area to residential. The City Manager/Mayor is informed. The City Manager/Mayor blocks actions made by the Councilman and arranges for a full investigation, followed by impeachment hearings. The Developer is investigated and may lose permits and licensing for any business venture they are involved in within that city, all who were involved with corrupt intent share in all the costs associated with managing corruption (wages for all people involved, costs for materials, and anyone harmed by the corrupt activity), and they may face criminal charges as well.

Scenario 3) A City Councilman negotiates a bribe with a local developer. The NSA reprimands both, but the Councilman ignores the NSA warning. The Counsilman begins to champion rezoning a commercial area to residential. The City Manager/Mayor is informed. The City Manager/Mayor either corruptly or negligently fails to take appropriate actions to eliminate the corrupt practices of the Councilman and Developer. The Governor of the State is notified, as well as the FBI. Pending the outcome of the formal investigation, either the Mayor appropriately runs impeachment hearings for the Councilman and removes business priveledges from the Developer, or every News agency is informed of the corrupt and negligent practices of every related politician and business person. Prior to elections, a summary is published in all the news agencies to educate the public during elections. The Better Business Bureau and Chamber of Commerce must publish the corrupt practices of the offending Developer and their business associates. A mark would accompany the printed name of each person running for office that the NSA had found involved in unresolved or repeated corrupt practices.

Scenario 3) The Governor and FBI fail to respond responsibly. The next level of controls would come into play; all linking back to keeping the public informed of which politicians and public servants are corruptly involved, as well as all of the people, factions, groups, corporations, … with which they corruptly interact. The people would vote out corrupt politicians and boycott businesses that support them.

The intent is to remove the secrecy that politicians enjoy for doing corrupt enterprise.

The NSA currently is only controlled by the Presidents Office. As such, they arbitrarily collect confidential information for any purpose desired by the President, and are instructed to ignore any information that is contrary to the President’s interests. How else do you think it was possible for the President to lose over $12 Billion in Iraq reconstruction money and still not be accountable for those funds?

Putting the NSA under State control by doctors of science certified in ethical conduct, significantly improves the ethical relationships between the American People, Politicians, and Special Interest Groups/Individuals/Corporations.

Please support and advocate the following proposal for modifying our political structure to include a Branch of Ethics, along with our Judicial, Legislative, and Executive Branches of Government.

Ethically Eliminate ALL Political Corruption:
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/jamesbdunn?p=57

Advertisements

Political Action & Corrupt Practices Website
~James Dunn

Inspired by comments by yates.jack

The Problem

A major problem with our political system is the great deal of corruption that exists behind closed doors. Making the public aware of the people and relationships could help bring control of our government back to the people.

Also, the interactions regarding any Bill or other political action proposed or taken can be so vast that the results are hard to understand, especially when it involves subjects we personally know little about.

Corporations and lobby groups have no soul or ethical outlook. They exist to promote thier agenda at any cost to the public, minimizing their own expense, and maximizing their own benefit; without any concern for the public. The soul of a corporation is created by it’s incorporating By-Laws. I’ve never seen a corporate by-law that requires ethical business practices.

The Solution

The United States (and every country) needs a website that tracks the major influencing bodies that influence each political representative, regarding each and every political action; identify every person, corporation, lobby group, …. and provide their contact information. Since these persons have greater influence over our elected representatives than the general public, the general public should be allowed to contact these persons, corporations, and lobby groups directly. Including all levels of influence within those bodies of influence.

We need a website that allows the public to better understand every political action proposed and taken; and to provide a means for the public to intelligently interact with each political action.

If it were known that a particular company was influencing a politician, to act against public interests, then the public could boycott that company and the companies that do business with them. If a company would lose millions of dollars because of a public boycott, then that company might be influenced to reconsider being involved with any corrupt practices.

This is not an overwhelming task. Many websites provide most of the pieces to this larger concept already.

Desired interactive web tools:

The Bill.

Explanations associated with each Bill.

All political representatives who sponsor each Bill, including silent representatives where possible.

Historical trends of each Representative.

An editorial section associated with each Bill entry, with an automated confidence rating.

Who initiated the Bill and why, and the far reaching ethical implications. To include lobby groups, corporations, and any other special interest groups.

Contact information for each lobby group, corporation, and other special interest group associated with each Bill.

Provide web-based interactive flow charts that map out every political action so that the public can more fully understand the actions taken by our politicians and how those actions affect everything. This is easily implementable. Hyperlinks would allow linking major influencing bodies with the costs, benefits, and corruption resulting from each political action proposed or taken. The who, what, when, where, why, and how regarding every political action.

Hyperlinks would also allow each action to be linked to related previous political actions taken. This provides a mechanism for the public to understand the incremental changes taken in politics to achieve a goal, contrary to public interests.

An interactive tool for users to cite practical, ethical, and corrupt relationships, with a confidence factor assigned based upon username demonstrated reliability, public polled confidence, and web editor assigned expert ratings of usernames.

An interactive flow chart for each Bill that shows the relationships with other Bills to show trends and possible corrupt practices.

An email notification system where the user can enter multiple sets of keywords and perhaps other conditions where an email is automatically generated to the user to notify them of high interest Bills or other political actions. “BILL, global warming, oil” OR “SPEACH, civil rights, terrorism, -media” OR “ALL, Baltimore, Maryland” OR ” …

A Forum tool similar to the one used in the above Table of Contents of this blog site, to allow users to discuss each political action independently; with a tool button to show or hide the forum display to avoid website clutter.

Hyperlinks to organizations that support each political action.

Hyperlinks to organizations that oppose each political action.

A tool to allow each user to add their name to either support or oppose each political action, why, and link boxes to support reasoning; with options for annonymous versus user disclosed identification.

Websites that provide some of these relationships:

Common Cause – A website where legislative bills are posted for each state

ConservativeUSA – Provides Contact info for all Senators, Congressmen, Governors, …

* Your State’s Congressmen
* Your States’ Senators

Corporate Watch – A group that monitors corporate initiatives in our government

National Center for Policy Analysis – Editorials regarding setting public policies

Standpedia – Web-based Flow Chart Utility

Regulation of a Weather Control System & Global Energy System
~James Dunn

If your grandparents lived to be 100 years old and they died today, they would have seen the majority of all pollution created, the human population increase by 2 billion people, more animal and plant extinctions than in the previous 2 million years, most of what technology has had to offer, and experienced life before technology as we know it.

Unless something is done, and done in the next few years, within your grandchildren’s lifetime, humanity may become largely extinct.

Think this is an exageration? There is an abundant amount of information to support this potential. As diversity diminishes, so does the stabilizing effects. Imagine corn, wheat, and potatos getting a plant virus or genetic disease that wipes out those crops, what will you do to feed 3 billion peoples? Corn and potatos are already at risk!

Think into the future; where active control of the weather is a reality.

If there is a practical method of controlling the weather so that Global Warming can be reversed, is it a crime for any governing body on Earth to abstain from helping to establish a Weather Control System (WCS)? Would they be liable for any damages, injuries, and deaths incurred because of negligently failing to provide remedy?

Weather Control System (WCS)

Additionally, the WCS can provide abundant clean power, more than what the world currently consumes; eliminating the majority of all human produced greenhouse gases.

WCS provides Solar Power to power the World

How would we regulate the power distribution and cost of power since it would be virtually a monopoly?

Obviously, we need to be careful about abusing such a system. But it is a viable tool for helping to ensure our survival; especially if nothing else works. One third to one half of all known land base species of plants and animals are expected to tend toward extinction within the next 50 years! You don’t have much time to make a difference!

What laws would have to be put into place to ensure the ethical use of a Weather Control System, and a Global Energy System?

Ethics in Health Care to promote Profits and Patient Care
~James Dunn

The Lovelace Healthcare System in Albuquerque, New Mexico is in tremendous trouble. An entire hospital (Lovelace on Gibson) is closing its doors. This very large hospital is closing the doors and displacing many hundreds of medical practitioners.

There is something very wrong! The surrounding hospitals are filled to capacity, which includes Presbyterian Hospital, University of New Mexico Hospital, and their satellite Clinics.

The Operating Rooms (OR) are constantly full and there is constant complaints of under-staffing. Surgeons and their patients do their cases until midnight and on the weekends, whenever they can get staffing.

The problem isn’t that there isn’t enough room, or enough staff ! The problem is that physicians do not make good administrators, and administrators do not exercise “Due Diligence”. Politics has superseded ethical credibility.

If you were to walk into any Administrators office and ask to see how much they lost last year due to incorrectly coded billing? They could not answer you. How often were the instructions in patients’ charts not followed by the nursing staff? They would not be able to answer you. Ask them how they motivate their staff? They would not answer you!

The entire Health care system is troubled by a lack of ethics! Most people do not even understand that Administrative Ethics is a set of tools for extensively evaluating resources, liabilities, and desired outcomes; working with the Big Picture. A lack of ethics should allow any business to make even more money, right? Wrong! “Due Diligence” is one of the significant factors for motivation that can not be taught in an unethical environment.

Some physicians may perform highly questionable procedures, or incorrectly document work performed, in response to poor billing and collection practices.

OR staff may put off ordering critical instruments and consumables because “It’s not my job!”, “I’ll get to it next week.”, or playing dumb “Oh, wasn’t that ordered?”.

Patients suffer for the same reasons because nursing staff may make excuses like “The doctor doesn’t know what they are doing.”, ”I’m too busy as it is.”, “That’s not my job.”. Meanwhile, the same nurse is chatting on the phone and numerous doctors have previously complained to hospital administrators about the staff member, but nothing is done and the nursing staff continues to ignore the physicians orders.

There is no incentive to do anything more than absolutely necessary to keep from being fired.

Administrators truly do not understand the complexities of the systems in which the work. Ask any administrator how to provide optimum health care for a patient based upon their insurance coverage so that they do not become liable for medical expenses they can not afford; they can not give you a reasonable answer! The hospital aborbs the losses in many cases.

Ask an Administrator how to get the nursing staff to consistently follow the doctors’ orders. You’ll get a blank stare! Nurses are relatively uneducated as compared to physicians, yet they independently make decisions about patient health care that directly contradicts the physicians’ orders, and the patient suffers. Weak and critically ill patients do not even get fed at times; and they may have died.

Outspoken persons of principal are weeded out by forcing them out. The unethical have more influence unless the system structure forces ethical practice. The present health care structure is innately unethical.

This is where a combination of well-trained Administrators, Performance Based Wages, an active Ethical Review Board structure, and a Continuous Improvement Process (ISO9001) provides the innate structure to continuously improve administrative processes and hospital procedures. Currently, complex relationships are governed by emotions, rather than by measurable metrics (data points).

Ethical Review Boards (Every employment and advocacy group should have one)
http://www.aapor.org/pdfs/AAPOR_Code_2005.pdf

Hospital Administration Training
http://www.epracticemanagement.org/

A few examples of deficient processes:

There is an inadequate number of Operating Rooms available to physicians. Physicians that consistently have cases to perform want “Block Time” so that they can schedule at least some of their surgeries around predictable times and days. Physicians often work more than 12 hours a day, so any savings in time is greatly appreciated. However, hospitals currently provide block time to certain physicians based upon the Good Ole’ Boys club mentality and prejudice. Not based upon ethical need. Rather than increasing the number of Operating Rooms, the OR staff could be trained to become much more efficient to provide for the needs of the physicians and their patients. Any wait time, is wasted time, and costs the hospital many thousands of dollars an hour.

Surgery provides the hospital with money. Insurance companies pay for surgeries at a reduced rate and pocket a large portion of the revenue from paid premiums. The health care system does not benefit from these revenues. Insurance companies do NOT build or maintain hospitals. Therefore, any hospital surviving on the edge can not improve its services.

The hospital has a Physician interface on its’ computer system to provide secure access to patient information. Each doctors’ interface can be customized based upon their user login. A simple tool for tracking staff performance would be to provide a page with all of the staff names in the hospital. If a physician has a good experience with a staff member, positive marks and notations can be made to improve a staff members’ performance rating; and negative marks and notations for deficient performance or neglect. This system can be directly tied into the employees Performance Based Wage. Similarly, every staff member, administrator, physician, and vendor can be rated and tracked in the hospital system. Physicians who are neglectful of their patients might lose their Block Time, obtain Block Time for helping to provide for uncompensated patient care, …

Create a State approved non-profit health insurance system. Disallow any for-profit health insurance from doing business in New Mexico. Use the excess revenue from paid premiums to build and maintain hospital support systems. Lovelace would not be competing with Presbyterian or UNM hospitals; they would ethically share resources and profits. Ethical as in reduced redundancy, competent health providers and staffing, efficient operations, and minimized opportunities for cases of liable.

Because of the increased revenue, all hospitals would make greater profits than at present.

Corporate management that deviates from ethical standards would be punished by fines and criminal prosecution. A defined structure for investor profits and rejuvenation of facilities would be a subject of on-going ethical debate. Ethical tools would be used to document the thought processes behind decisions.

In Tuscaloosa, Alabama the county charges a small amount on annual property taxes to provide health care for the uninsured. They have some of the lowest property taxes in the nation. Yet, every person in Tuscaloosa County has health care! And the hospital (Druid City Hospital) has a windfall of excess money every year. Admittedly, their Emergency Room has a four hour wait, but everyone is seen that needs to be seen. Those with paid insurance premiums are routed to other hospitals for care.Health care can be profitable and manageable, so long as sufficient resources are consistently dedicated to ethical administration.

Ethically Eliminate ALL Political Corruption

Our Political System was a revelation in 1776, before

Hidden Microphones & Cameras,
Big Business,
Indoor Plumbing and Toilet Paper,

before Ethics was understood,

before the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank (corporation),

and

before the National Security Agency (NSA).

Corruption in the United States costs Americans over 400 Billion dollars annually in misappropriated, squandered, lost revenue, and otherwise stolen Federal funds. This all started with Alexander Hamilton establishing a centralized bank for the US Government, his father’s bank. “Alexander Hamilton was a talented political figure in American history, but he was prevented from achieving widespread recognition because of an overbearing nature and an inability to relate to the concerns of the common man. His views on the issues of favoring federal authority over the states rights, now firmly established, are still argued today.

The Bank of New York, opened on June 9, 1784, was created by private investors and chartered (underwritten) by The Bank of England. It was the first bank in New York City.

The Bank won a 20-year charter from Congress that was rescinded in 1811, due to its association with the Bank of England, tight monetary policies, and competition with state chartered banks. Some accused it of corruption, but it survived and continues to operate independently.

In 1913, the Bank of New York became the controlling bank of America’s central banking scheme, the Federal Reserve System.”

http://zeitgeistmovie.com/main.htm

Since the Declaration of Independence (and the first fight against taxation without representation), technology has allowed Special Interest groups (to include Terrorist Groups, souless Corporations, and corrupt politicians) to use the innate weaknesses of our political structure to undermine the basis for our Constitution; a modern form of racketeering and organized crime, jeopardizing national security.

The Citizens of the United States
require implementation of
State representation, including ALL states,
by a large and diverse Ethical Oversight Committee
to ensure the security of peoples Freedoms,
to manage National Security Agency (NSA) operations,
and
to determine how the information collected and derived by
the NSA shall best be used
as it relates to our Freedoms and Security,
and to “absolutely” restrict this information
from any other purpose.

Since we were forced into a financial monopoly where the US Government is owned by the Federal Reserve Corporation (Fed), the ghosts behind the face of a bank, continue to manipulate the world into a continuous chain of wars. A chain that has killed many millions of people, and that deters development. The Fed continues to dominate the world as a loose governing power and will continue to promote a one world government future vision. This in itself isn’t so concerning to me, but when they achieve this, what vision do they have for establishing world order beneficial to everyone? Will they continue to segregate society into warring factions? Will we ever promote economic development worldwide for the greatest benefit to each individual? We need to establish a mechanism now to prevent unethical manipulation and mass exterminations as tools of profit for a select few.

The Fed uses Natzi tactics for incurring wealth.

Currently, the NSA is soley controlled by the office of the President of the United States and only needs a single judge to obtain a warrant to covertly monitor any person or corporation (wire tapping, covertly breaking in to copy documents, copy by any means computer information, record in detail the habits and personal relationships of anyone, …). Presently, the President took control away from that judge and even though the judge was ineffectual, the President now has absolute control over the NSA.

The President is a puppet of the Fed high-level directors. Therefore the Fed controls the United States, not the President, not the People, and certainly not ethics.

Current warrants are meaningless and effectively allows the NSA to collect information without public scrutiny, while Presidential directives prevent the NSA from monitoring special interest group corrupt practices and disclosing those actions to the public.

Under our current system a single judge would have to oversee thousands of covert transactions nationwide to adequately monitor national security issues, and to follow up to ensure those requests were legitimate. Further, since information collected by the NSA can be arbitrarily “classified”, the NSA can arbitrarily prevent the judge from monitoring the kinds of data collected.

The current system is not practical and therefore unethical, there is no reasonable way the judge would know what the NSA does with the information collected; and since the judge is controlled by the President, this is highly susceptible to corrupt practices. The current system allows for shielding corruption while promoting unscrupulous special interest activities.

The “Protect America Act” is unconstitutional. But a simple change to provide REPRESENTATION by all States in the covert collection and processing of data would make the Act Constitutionally sound.

The NSA must be managed by doctors of science (one parallel position for each State elected political representative; but with no affiliation) to evaluate all data collected and eliminate the useless requirement of warrant by a judge (presently coerced into signing off on any NSA warrant presented before them); and to require the NSA to monitor for corrupt political practices (terrorist activities, criminal activities, political practices that endanger National Security, …), with the mandate to notify the offending parties quietly to correct their unethical behavior, only then after they have failed to correct their actions adequately, their actions are publish on a NSA publicly available website.

We the people would then boycott corrupt representatives and their supporting corporations. The associated District Attorney would be notified, and be given the details to substantiate investigation. The District Attorney would then fully investigate and prosecute in accordance with the law. The NSA would at no time directly intervene, thereby limiting their power to nudging our political system away from corrupt activities.

The following details how to update our 200 year old political structure to provide representative governance that promotes the economy, desires of the masses, and ethical government practices; allowing the Government and the people to think as ONE.

_________________________________________________________

To find & email your specific Congressmen and Senators:

To email Congressman all across the United States:

To talk directly with the staff of your representatives:

  • (202) 225-3121 for the House
  • (202) 224-3121 for the Senate

—————————————————————————————————

COPY & PASTE THE FOLLOWING to your Representatives

Subject: Create an “Oversight of NSA Ethics committee” (ONE) to manage NSA Data Collection, Assessment, and Directives in the United States

Formatted Version:
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-YW18nxE7eqtd0CMJGCB94Xu4?p=57

As your constituent, I request that you forward the following to all political delegates in every State of the United States, and that a Highly Ethical group of diverse people representing every State and its population be instated to provide ethical oversight and management of all National Security Agency (NSA) data collection, assessments, and directives.

Because this large representative body of individuals will act as a covert, but highly trained publicly elected governing body, this will allow the NSA to continue data collection without warrant. The Senate and Congress will provide “oversight and not direct control” of this new branch in our political structure, thereby providing the needed checks and balances.

The problem with our current political system is that Special Interests (Oil Companies, Defense Contractors, Big Business Corporations, Foreign Interests, …) actively and covertly influence our political representatives. Private research (to include Terrorist involvement with genetic engineering in all its forms, nuclear physics research, economic initiatives, social reform efforts, …) are potentially high risk threats to National Security, yet are largely unmonitored. Corrupt and Neglective influences are not ONLY the fault of our Representatives, they are the fault of our unupdated 200 year old political structure.

To correct this weakness in our Government, in addition to the Senate and Congress, create a new branch of State elected political representatives whose only purpose is to manage the National Security Agency (NSA), which did not exist at the birth of our political structure.

Candidates for these new positions must be doctors of science with proven understanding of ethical evaluation. Doctors of science are necessary because they need to understand and interact with the inner workings of computer software to continuously analyze the large amounts of diverse real world data collected.

Our present political structure does not have an ethical political component to effectively neutralize the criminal aspect of political pandering, coercive control over our Representatives, or Terrorist influences in our Society and in our Government, but we do have the resources to do so.

The National Security Agency (NSA) monitors ALL organizations: CIA, NIS, Air Force, Army, PLO, Al-Qaeda, Defense Contractors, Oil Companies, Greenpeace, ALL of our Politicians, and basically all organizations whether domestic or abroad. Anyone with this information controls the focus of our Nation, along with our Freedoms and Security.

An important point here is that collecting information is necessary and of little negative consequence in an ethical environment, what specifically is done with that information is extraordinarily important, especially in unethical and abusive hands.

Currently, Special Interests unethically manipulate our country’s assets, despite “We the Peoples” desires. How many people and soldiers have died supporting a business interest rather than a national interest?

Greater than $12 Billion “lost” in Iraq, destruction of New Orleans, War in Iraq, manipulation of the media, greater than $10 Billion illegally allocated to Halliburton where they subsequently moved outside of our legal system to Dubai (Saudi Arabia), …

As a consequence of Special Interest actions, they erode human rights, leave our country unnecessarily exposed to security threats, and hinder commerce that would flourish were it not for unethical business practices of Special Interests and Large Corporations.

Each “Oversight of NSA Ethics committee” (ONE) delegate represents elected representation by certified highly ethical doctors and non-partisan control over our country’s human rights, freedoms, and security.

Together with Congress and the Senate, ONE delegates provide a tertiary and complementary system of representation, with each representative political faction having unique assets and control mechanisms. The combination of focused representation for business, the people, and ethics makes the system innately representative, well informed, ethical, and stable. Businesses will continue to sponsor individual Senators and Congressmen, however, all money contributed to ONE candidates shall go into a common fund to promote all potential ONE candidates equally within each State.

Because this large representative body of individuals will act as a covert, but highly trained publicly elected governing body, this will allow the NSA to continue data collection without warrant.

No longer will we need to have less Freedom to have more Security,
or vice versa.

These highly trained elected personnel provide for independent maximizing of Freedoms and maximizing of Security for all citizens !!! While the Congress and Senate provide oversight and continues to control the military as part of the checks and balances to make this political structure stable.

Presently, special interests make Security and Freedom mutually incompatible. Many countries have the same political structure as we do and yet live in a police state where the individual has no recognized rights; we must prevent a similar situation from happening here in the United States. The current actions of the President’s Office are a prelude of worse things to come.

To take into account all perspectives and actual events to maximize both Freedom and Security for our entire country requires much more raw information than 10,000 people can amass, and assessment that would take these people many lifetimes to be just. But events happen concurrently every day that threaten our Freedoms and Security.

NSA computers process diverse data at great speeds to provide minute by minute evaluation of threats to our national security, and currently as directed by special interests. To stop the unethical use of NSA resources, a large group of persons extensively trained in ethical reasoning needs to create the “computer-based automated keys” (Directives) for unlocking relationships related to promoting BOTH Freedoms and Security.

Directives are computer software analysis functions that sift through real world information. Something like Antivirus programs for protecting your computer. When key relationships are found, a task is generated to cleanup that corrupt system. Ethical care must be taken to ensure good relationships are not disturbed, while corrupt activities are corrected. The concept being: “To do the least necessary to allow unhindered natural social development; while ensuring that repeated corrupt practices of the same types identified do not recur.

As Directives are developed that can be generalized for a particular class of social system, they can be shared amongst similarally structured nations. Thereby helping to reduce the development costs for all countries; and provide international peer review of all Directives developed. At no time will raw data be shared by various National Security Agencies of the different nations

Computer systems have been used for similar purposes for many years with great success in economics to limit risks and promote investment diversity. By developing automated directives, this helps to provide integrity and consistent behavior of the NSA. The derived results can then be evaluated by this large team of elected Representatives using state of the art ethical evaluation tools; thus ensuring the information collected is used solely to independently promote the Freedoms and Security of ALL citizens.

Please instate a comprehensive “Oversight of NSA Ethics committee” (ONE) to manage the National Security Agency (NSA) as outlined below, a system allowing the Government and the people to think as one.

  • To maintain equitable representation of all peoples, each State shall publicly elect an Oversight of NSA Ethics (ONE) delegate paralleling each elected Congressman and Senator position; but having no affiliation.
  • The Constitution for each State shall act as the basis for the ethical perspective of each delegate.
  • The requirements for election as a ONE delegate are:
    • shall be a certified doctor from a nationally accredited school
    • shall have authored and published a paper related to ethics in a nationally distributed professional journal
    • shall be a permanent resident of that State
    • shall pass uniform but unique tests related to Ethics, Critical Reasoning, probability, and statistics
    • shall be free of a felony record
    • shall not be strongly biased regarding any special interests
    • shall forever be disallowed from ever discussing any information formulated or witnessed while in office; and shall teach ethical evaluation for two years after their term in office
    • shall submit themselves for lie detection and questioning periodically to prevent outside influence by any special interest
  • The delegates shall be relocated to the surroundings near the NSA and will be furnished Government owned housing while in office. Physical security for the delegates shall consist of NSA surveillance with an armed NSA controlled security force to control any attempt to access or disproportionately influence the delegate or their family.
  • Each delegate shall have a two person staff at the NSA and a two person staff in their home State to monitor, collect, and research information.
  • Each State shall have one highly trained field agent for each delegate for that State whom shall collectively implement directives from the NSA using legal resources.
  • All work surrounding NSA data collection shall be done in a secure facility protected from military threat.
  • Absolutely no raw data or interest specific data or interest specific directives shall ever leave the facility under penalty of treason related to all intentionally involved.
  • No interest specific data or interest specific directive shall be propagated outside of the confines of the NSA by delegate staff or agents under penalty of racketeering.
  • The ONE delegates shall poll their respective communities related to values and perspectives, but polls shall not contain any Special Interest specific information.
  • The NSA shall devise and maintain a relational database to allow delegates to productively relate all measure and kind of ethical issue to the vast amounts of information collected by the NSA.
  • The delegates shall formulate “Automated Directives” for automatically: flagging potentially destructive relationships, developing priorities, developing issued directives to field agents, monitor metrics to verify results, track long term effects and related relationships, provide for a continuously updated scores related to the qualities related to our freedoms and security at that moment in time, and provide simulations for anticipating the effects of issuing a proposed directive and how it would affect the freedoms and security scores, …
  • The creation of directives shall solely be governed by the ONE Committee. The President, Congress, the House, the Military, nor any other special interest group shall ever have any influence over the creation of directives, other than approved ethical channels of communication. Any attempt to do so outside of approved channels shall be considered treason within the confines of the NSA, and racketeering otherwise, and all involved shall share the same fate, regardless of political standing or financial backing.
  • Because the positions of the delegates are elected positions. Data would be provided by the NSA which tracks the number of hours each delegate actively performed research, the influence each delegate had on the overall freedom and security qualities, and the core generalized formulas for creating the Automated Directives would be publicly disclosed but would not relate delegate involvement nor the data or type of data that they relate. This is necessary to help ensure high-tech corporations do not fillfully subvert NSA monitored data. Each delegate would be allowed to create public announcements that do not violate that which is outlined above.
  • The ONE delegates shall govern themselves regarding inappropriate actions generated by a delegate, with periodic oversight by the Senate and Congress. A delegate that fails to use ethical reasoning in promoting a Directive and which benefits a special interest may be penalized and a State elected alternate may take their place.
  • The term of service for each Delegate shall be four years; followed by a two year mandatory position at an accredited University teaching related ethics topics involving analysis and software. The Delegate may then accept nomination for the following election cycle.
  • Classes in ethics for learning to create automated Directives shall use independently developed computer models and simulation systems. At no time shall any Directive from the NSA be directly analyzed. The simulated environment would cause errors inconsistent with NSA real world processing. However, relationships discovered can be submitted to the NSA for review through approved ethical channels.
  • Collectively, the ONE committee shall determine the information necessary to guide the President, Congress, Senate, and the Military. The President, Congress, Senate, and the Military will have continuous one-way input into the NSA as part of NSA data collection, without warrant, the feedback will be immediate, so there is no need for any political party or military component to have dialog with ONE delegates or the NSA data collection and assessment systems.
  • The Congress and Senate shall provide a team trained in ethical evaluation to periodically monitor (not control) the NSA and report back to the Senate and Congress.
  • The military remains under the control of the Senate and the Congress; and the NSA shall only be allowed restricted control over a military asset with minute by minute support of the majorities of both the Senate and Congress where time critical relationships exist.
  • Every political representative in the United States will be able to send their viewpoints to the NSA by sending an email to a NSA server, with only an automated response. But their views will be collected and processed automatically by the data collection system. The same applies for all citizens. All citizens shall have representation and voice.
  • The administrators necessary to manage the NSA regarding operations personnel, supplies, existing field agents, the budget, and all other aspects of the NSA shall answer to the ONE committee and shall provide a continuous and accurate assessment of resource managment to Congress.
  • As technology provides greater capabilities in diverse areas such as spy technologies, computer modeling of world economics, …, the NSA shall continue to evolve systems to better represent and anticipate the needs and desires of all citizens.

Under this system, the NSA shall collect and assess all information as practically possible worldwide, without the need for warrant in the United States.

Instate a comprehensive “Oversight of NSA Ethics committee” (ONE) to govern NSA data collection systems as outlined above; a system allowing the Government and the people to think as one.